According to @EmberCN, a trader known as silentraven realized $38.77M by manipulating XPL liquidations on Hyperliquid two days ago, and is still actively influencing XPL price action on the venue, keeping Hyperliquid’s XPL price roughly 35% higher than Binance at the time reported (source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 29, 2025). According to @EmberCN, the realized profits were bridged and dispersed into more than 20 addresses, and some of those addresses re-entered Hyperliquid with 1x positioning, coinciding with the noted price dislocation between Hyperliquid and Binance for XPL (source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 29, 2025). According to @EmberCN, traders engaging XPL on Hyperliquid should account for the venue-specific premium versus Binance and concentrated flow in sizing, risk limits, and liquidation thresholds (source: @EmberCN on X, Aug 29, 2025).

According to @lookonchain, a whale on Hyperliquid is attempting to manipulate $XPL to liquidate short positions. According to @lookonchain, in the past three hours the whale created four wallets and deposited $10M $USDC into Hyperliquid. According to @lookonchain, traders "shouldn't short $XPL unless you can survive a liquidation," citing the whale-driven setup.

According to @lookonchain, a whale manipulated XPL on Hyperliquid, causing address 0xC2Cb's XPL short to be fully liquidated. According to @lookonchain, the realized loss from the liquidation totaled $4.59M. According to @lookonchain, the incident was reported on Aug 27, 2025.

According to @EmberCN, intense manipulation led to AUCTION's price reaching a new high of $68 before falling back to $45. A whale or institution withdrew 26% of AUCTION's total supply from Binance, using four addresses to withdraw 2 million AUCTION tokens between February 23 and March 16. This action significantly impacted the market, demonstrating the influence of large holders on AUCTION's price dynamics.